Table 4.15: comparison of actual and optimized results LIST OF FIGURESįigure 2.1: Showing the location of various pressure nodes on a well.įigure 2.2: Determination of flow capacityįigure 2.3: IPR Curve for Single Phase (Liquid) Flowįigure 2.4: Phase Diagram for Two Phase Flowįigure 2.6: Results of well testing and Simulation runs plotted in dimensionless formįigure 2.7: System performance for various tubing sizeįigure 2.8: System performance for various wellhead chokesįigure 2.9: Effect of Increased Liquid Rate on Gradient Curvesįigure 2.10: Effect of GLR on Gradient Curvesįigure 2.11: Flowing BHP as a function of GLR for different flow rates and the same WHPįigure 2.13: Favorable GLR and corresponding liquid production rate with VLP Curveįigure 2.14: Effect of Water cut on Gradient Curvesįigure 2.15: Flow regimes in horizontal flowįigure 2.16: Flow regimes in vertical flowįigure 2.18: Continuous and Intermittent liftįigure 2.19: Injection pressure kick-off requirements - well dead.įigure 2.20: The function of gas Lift valves and mandrels.įigure 2.21: Estimating optimum gas lift rateįigure 2.22: Gas lift well performance curve.įigure 3.1: Production profile for well J-12Tįigure 3.2: Flow chart of system analysis using prosperįigure 3.3: Menus and Options in Prosper Main Screenįigure 3.5: Deviation survey data for well J-12T. Table 4.14: Summary of optimization result for well J-12T
![hold up 1.4 in pipesim hold up 1.4 in pipesim](http://drbratland.com/PipeFlow1/images/Figure1_4_1.gif)
![hold up 1.4 in pipesim hold up 1.4 in pipesim](https://docplayer.net/docs-images/111/197517388/images/6-0.jpg)
Table 4.13: showing the optimization results Table 4.12: Showing the maximum economical water cut for well J-12T Table 4.11: Showing forecast results for declining reservoir pressure on gas lifted well Table 4.10: Showing parameter for forecast Table 4.9: Showing results of sensitivity on gas lift injection rates Table 4.8: Showing result from gas lift design Table 4.7: Continuous gas lifts data entry Table 4.6: Showing tubing head sensitivity results Table 4.5: Parameters for tubing head pressure sensitivity. Table 4.4: Showing tubing head sensitivity results Table 4.3: Parameters for tubing head pressure sensitivity. Table 4.2: Showing base case forecast results Table 3.8: Last well test data for well J-12T Table 3.6: Composite IPR model data entry
![hold up 1.4 in pipesim hold up 1.4 in pipesim](https://downloadly.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Schlumberger-PIPESIM.png)
![hold up 1.4 in pipesim hold up 1.4 in pipesim](https://0.academia-photos.com/89754030/22302308/21520168/s200__._.jpg)
Table 3.4: Downhole equipments data entry Table 3.5: Geothermal gradient data entry This project is dedicated to the Almighty God whose gift of life, love, favor, strength, wisdom and grace saw me throughout my stay for this Five years programme. 3.1.1 PROSPER’S SETUP FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSISģ.1.2 WORKING PROCEDURE FOR WELL MODEL SET-UPĤ.0 INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSISĤ.2 EVALUATION OF VARIOUS OPTIMIZATION PLANSĤ.3 SHORT TERM OPTIMIZATION OF WELL J-12TĤ.3.1 SENSITIVITY ON TUBING HEAD PRESSUREĤ.5.2 RESULTS FROM GAS LIFT DESIGN FOR WELL J-12TĤ.6 SENSITIVITES ON GASLIFT INJECTION RATESĤ.7 OIL PRODUCTION FORECAST FOR WELL J-12T GASLIFTĤ.9 OPTIMIZATION RESULTS FOR WELL J-12T GASLIFT